atcc c tropicalis (ATCC)
ATCC is a verified supplier 
ATCC manufactures this product 
95
Structured Review
ATCC
atcc c tropicalis
Atcc C Tropicalis, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 75 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/atcc c tropicalis/product/ATCC
Average 95 stars, based on 75 article reviews
Atcc C Tropicalis, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 75 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/atcc c tropicalis/product/ATCC
Average 95 stars, based on 75 article reviews
atcc c tropicalis - by Bioz Stars,
2026-05
95/100 stars
Images
1) Product Images from "Integrated Genomic and Phenotypic Analyses Reveal Convergent Resistance Patterns in Clinical Candida tropicalis Isolates"
Article Title: Integrated Genomic and Phenotypic Analyses Reveal Convergent Resistance Patterns in Clinical Candida tropicalis Isolates
Journal: Mycoses
doi: 10.1111/myc.70181
Figure Legend Snippet: SNP‐based phylogenetic tree of hospital isolates and the ATCC control reference genome, C. tropicalis MYA‐3404.
Techniques Used: Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Heat map analysis of all fourteen hospital C. tropicalis isolates. Each cell represents the ANI value in percentage calculated between two genomes. The colour of each cell ranges from light to dark red, corresponding to lower and higher ANI values, respectively.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Quantification of ergosterol content. The black bar represents the control strain C. tropicalis MYA‐3404, that is sensitive to antifungal agents. The grey bars represent the hospital isolates. Statistical significance was calculated using One‐way ANOVA ( p < 0.0001) coupled to Dunnett's multiple comparisons test: Control versus 46: p = 0.4182; Control versus 47: p = 0.0009; Control versus 50: p < 0.0001; Control versus 52: p < 0.0001; Control versus 53: p < 0.0001; Control versus 54: p = 0.9957; Control versus 57: p = 0.0066; Control versus 58: p = 0.0838; Control versus 60: p = 0.0051; Control versus 61: p = 0.9997; Control versus 62: p = 0.0004; Control versus 63: p = 0.0003; Control versus 65: p = 0.0032; Control versus 66: p = 0.2012.
Techniques Used: Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Adhesion to human cells. The black bar represents the control strain C. tropicalis MYA‐3404, that is sensitive to antifungal agents. The grey bars represent the hospital isolates. Statistical significance was calculated using One‐way ANOVA ( p < 0.0001) coupled to Dunnett's multiple comparisons test: Control versus 46: p = 0.0001; Control versus 47: p = 0.0283; Control versus 50: p = 0.9997; Control versus 52: p = 0.9341; Control versus 53: p = 0.002; Control versus 54: p = 0.9999; Control versus 57: p > 0.9999; Control versus 58: p = 0.1689; Control versus 60: p = 0.0016; Control versus 61: p = 0.8017; Control versus 62: p = 0.0027; Control versus 63: p = 0.0035; Control versus 65: p = 0.9653; Control versus 66: p = 0.6953.
Techniques Used: Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Biofilm formation. The black bar represents the control strain C. tropicalis MYA‐3404, that is sensitive to antifungal agents. The grey bars represent the hospital isolates. Statistical significance was calculated using one‐way ANOVA ( p < 0.0001) coupled to Dunnett's multiple comparisons test: Control versus 46: p = 0.0001; Control versus 47: p < 0.0001; Control versus 50: p < 0.0001; Control versus 52: p = 0.0588; Control versus 53: p = 0.0221; Control versus 54: p < 0.0001; Control versus 57: p = 0.9993; Control versus 58: p = 0.0644; Control versus 60: p = 0.5937; Control versus 61: p < 0.0001; Control versus 62: p = 0.1254; Control versus 63: p = 0.0971; Control versus 65: p = 0.5359; Control versus 66: p < 0.0001.
Techniques Used: Control
Figure Legend Snippet: Quantification of chitin content. The black bar represents the control strain C. tropicalis MYA‐3404, that is sensitive to antifungal agents. The grey bars represent the hospital isolates. Statistical significance was calculated using One‐way ANOVA ( p < 0.0001) coupled to Dunnett's multiple comparisons test: Control versus 46: p = 0.1409; Control versus 47: p = 0.9911; Control versus 50: p = 0.9996; Control versus 52: p = 0.0012; Control versus 53: p = 0.408; Control versus 54: p = 0.408; Control versus 57: p = 0.0034; Control versus 58: p = 0.0024; Control versus 60: p < 0.0001; Control versus 61: p = 0.0007; Control versus 62: p = 0.0005; Control versus 63: p < 0.0001; Control versus 65: p = 0.0403; Control versus 66: p < 0.0001.
Techniques Used: Control